In the recent decision of Otto Candies, LLC v. KPMG, LLP, C.A. No. 2018-0435-MTZ (Del. Ch. Apr. 25, 2019), the Delaware Court of Chancery found that Rule 15(aaa) applied to a case transferred from the Superior Court when plaintiffs, faced with a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6),
Rules and Links
Chancery Amends Rules Governing Motion Practice
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in News, Rules and Links
Effective August 1, 2017, an amendment to Court of Chancery Rule 171(f) will go effective, setting forth word limitations for non-dispositive motions, and letters to the Court. Under the amendment, motions filed with the Court–excluding those filed under Rules 12, 23, 23.1, 56 and 65, along with pre-trial and post-trial briefs–are subject to a more…
Delaware Supreme Court Adopts Rules To Govern Arbitrations Conducted Pursuant To The Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in Rules and Links
By Order dated June 17, 2015, and in accordance with Section 5804(a) of the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act, the Delaware Supreme Court adopted Rules to govern arbitrations conducted pursuant to that Act. The Rules, which may be viewed here, become effective on June 22, 2015.
Court of Chancery Publishes Amended Rules 96-98
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in Rules and Links
In a prior post, we discussed the implementation of the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act, along with the concurrent amendment of Delaware Supreme Court Rules 6, 7, 9 and 32, and Delaware Court of Chancery Rules 96 through 98.
The Court has published an Order Amending Rules 6, 7, 9 and 32 of the Rules …
Implementation of the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in Rules and Links, Summary Proceedings
The Delaware Supreme Court and the Court of Chancery have each amended their Rules to implement the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act. The announcement of these amendments provides,
Amendments to the Delaware Supreme Court Rules and the Court of Chancery Rules Related to the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act
To implement aspects of the recently-enacted Delaware Rapid…
Court of Chancery Amends Pro Hac Vice Rules
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in Rules and Links
On January 16, 2015, the Court of Chancery adopted an amendment to Rule 170, which governs pro hac vice motions. Effective February 2, 2015, the amended Rule 170 has increased the cost of filing a pro hac vice motion in the 2015 calendar year form $300 to $375. The motion will cost $400 in…
Sections 204 and 205 of the Delaware General Corporation Law Enacted
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in News, Rules and Links
On April 1, 2014, new provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL) went into effect, Sections 204 and 205 of the DGCL.
Section 204 of the DGCL provides corporations with the ability to ratify certain corporate actions that would otherwise have been void or voidable because of their failure to comply with statutory…
The Court Approves The Amendment Of Rule 6
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in Rules and Links
The Court of Chancery has approved the amendment of Rule 6(e). The amendment provides as follows:
(e) Additional time after service by mail or by e File. Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceedings within a prescribed period after being served and service…
“Good Cause” Standard Analyzed for Designating Information as Confidential Under Rule 5.1
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Earlier this year, the Court of Chancery enacted Rule 5.1, which raised the bar in terms of what information could remain confidential before the Court. Pursuant to sub-section (b) of the rule, “good cause” is required for information to remain confidential. According to the rule, “good cause … shall exist only if the public…
Motion to Seal No Longer Required for Confidential Complaints under Rule 5.1
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in Local Counsel, Rules and Links
Under the recently enacted Court of Chancery Rule 5.1, the Court of Chancery has set forth a new procedure for the filing of complaints under seal. For a previous post concerning Rule 5.1, click here. Under the previous rule, a party seeking to file a complaint under seal was required to contemporaneously file…